Here's the challenge we have as legislators. Before us we have the groups that have been identified so far—the Canadian bar, the manufacturers and exporters, the Canadian chamber, the Intellectual Property Institute, a series of large companies that have some credibility when it comes to business and understanding how intellectual property works—and they are saying the exact opposite of what you've just told us.
This is the challenge we have. How did we end up, as my friend said, in this “hyperbolic” scenario if there are two completely different versions of this piece of legislation coming forward to the public?