So a treaty of this scope—and forgive me, Chair, but I wanted to clarify some things before I got into the recommendation of this amendment—in terms of the potential number of people impacted, may I describe it as large? Am I being...? I don't want to paint the picture unfairly, but typically, if we were signing a tax treaty with France or even the entire EU, the number of people who might be implicated by this wouldn't be as large as with something we do with the United States just by the sheer number of people across the border, the sheer number of families that are interconnected.
Is that a fair assessment to make?