Is this trying to prevent the law of unintended consequences? I'm just trying to clarify Mr. Keddy's concern. I'm sure some of this originated in your department.
If this is a redundant amendment, an amendment that suggests that the Americans renege on FATCA and we obviously do the same, so be it and we move on with our relationship. Then again, it's a potentially supportable amendment, and Mr. Keddy raised some concern about a section under part XVIII under our own tax law which I can't imagine this amendment affecting.