I hear that potential offer in terms of perhaps costing the bank that e-mail, because that's what we're imagining this would be, an e-mail sent to a client.
I guess the argument is that if they're already looking at a person's account—there is the administrative cost that the banks have talked about that they're going to bear in trying to sift through this information and find people—the simple notification that their account has been flagged or targeted or whatever you want to say....
Again, for consumer rights and for consumer protection, this seems like a no-brainer to me. If information is being passed on to the bank about a Canadian, or someone who is suspected of being an American one way or another, we simply require the bank to notify that client, period. That's what this does.