Thank you.
I wasn't suggesting there was an easy answer to any of that, but I think we need to be extremely careful that the temporary foreign worker program not be a disincentive for training, because you can replace that labour somewhere else. This can become a greater problem.
I just want to explore your discussion on capital gains, because you're absolutely right that capital gains really isn't a break. It's simply a deferral of paying that tax and somewhere at the end of the road, someone at some point will need to pay that tax.
I think many of us look at capital gains. You pay taxes on your business or your firm or your woodlot all your life. You should be improving that. It should acquire some assets and some value along the way and when you sell that, you're going to pay tax on it anyway. But on top of that, you have a capital gain. So you're suggesting a change of 2.4%, I think was the number that you used of tax revenue, to Canada's tax system. But that is a lot of money. How do you replace that? If the government were to stop capital gains tomorrow, would there be enough reinvestment? Would there be enough of an incentive to make up for that gap of 2.4%?