Yes.
When the legislation was implemented, it was clearly established at that time that vital medical flights were to be exempted. That was always the spirit of the legislation. It caught up in 2007 with the next amendment, when it was really discovered and then advocated that Hope Air was not an air ambulance service but still was vital for medical appointments.
Now we're looking at it again, more than seven years out. I take the view that the intent and spirit of the legislation is very clear. It applies to all Canadians in that scenario, through charities. It's time for us to continue to look at our legislation and keep up with changes in society. Here Hope Air has changed its business model. It considerably grows more, and we put a considerable amount of money back into the airline industry through our purchases. A simple act like this would, I think, deliver good results.