Thank you.
I think the cancellation of the grant has certainly had an impact on activity, particularly in the housing retrofit sector. It did provide the seed funding to homeowners to do the audit on what needed to be done, and then additional funds to actually see through on the audit. It was advantageous because the homeowner had actually made quite a significant investment in the home to get a better-performing home, particularly on energy.
With the disappearance of the grant, obviously that is no longer the case. Some provinces, I think, are still maintaining a program, but not to the same extent. In terms of the housing retrofit sector, we have 12 million homes in Canada, so it's a big sector with lots of emissions, lots of energy and water use and so on. So it hasn't had a positive effect, and it hasn't really been replaced in a meaningful way with anything that we have seen.
So in housing, there are many homeowners who go through our programs but mainly on the new construction, because we don't have a retrofit program. We're trying to get the new housing stock to be better-performing, but the existing housing stock is in big need, not of figuring out how to do it but actually incentivizing to do it. We know how to do it; we just need the seed funding to actually follow it through. We need money for energy improvements.
On your second question—