There would be. To your point of municipalities working together, I think there are examples where there have been facilities built that have crossed jurisdictions and they figured out a way to both build them on the capital side and then share an operating cost, whether that's on percentage of use, or working with academic institutions, etc. To keep an asset beyond its useful life or to replace it for the sake of replacing it isn't what we're recommending at all. Communities need to look at what their current needs are, what their current income base is, to allow them to set those priorities. I use it as an example because many communities in fact did build facilities at that time, and there are many small communities where it might be their only facility, and it's going to be detrimental if they're out of commission.
On October 20th, 2014. See this statement in context.