Thank you to our witnesses for being here. I'm going to start with Ms. Reynolds and then Mr. Mattina after that.
Ms. Reynolds, when you talk about your recreation and sport infrastructure, I tend to agree with you that there are a number of our small communities and others that are facing renewals or whatever in recreation, whether it be fields, whether it be arenas and those types of things, and maybe some refurbishment. What I would like to understand when you're talking about the $3 billion ask here is exactly what kinds of things you're hoping to achieve with that money. Maybe more important, as you see things change.... I've always struggled a little bit with the communities that set a priority of building a new arena, for example, and then can't maintain it after. Sometimes it's easy to get the capital money, but then the communities suffer because they don't have the tax base to actually support it.
Is there some way that you would look at maybe regional facilities bringing together multiple communities so that these things could be better afforded on a long-term basis?