That's based on research done by Tammy Schirle, who has found that for the families who are receiving the UCCB, it actually leads to a decline in the workforce participation of women in those families. I think there's some fuzziness about that particular program, frankly. Is it intended to essentially be a cash transfer to families, in which case there are a lot of different ways to skin that cat? Is it a way to actually help people pay for child care services so that they can go to paid employment?
One of the other weird things that happens with the UCCB, in addition to giving it to, frankly, the wealthy bankers' wives, is this. Because it's taxable income, it looks as though it's probably actually reducing people's access to subsidized child care because it's included in the assessment of family income.