Thank you.
In terms of income splitting, Ms. Woolley, is there a real risk of subordinating the secondary income, or the lower-income worker? You could have a higher-income earner, a tax lawyer, as an example, and then the lower income in the union could be doing something really important for society, like running an NGO. Is it possible that we would actually subordinate some really important and valuable and meaningful work being done by the people in the family who just happen to be paid less, and as a result there's a risk, in terms of productivity but also in terms of societal benefit, to income splitting?