If the employer is currently paying travel or lodging or a per diem, etc., that stuff wouldn't be claimable, obviously. This would be for anyone who's not getting that or for anything that's above and beyond what they're already receiving.
We have collective agreements that set this stuff out. It's not applicable to some people. But the most vulnerable people, whom we want to move around, don't have access to any of these things at all.
It wouldn't replace what the employers are doing; it doesn't take the onus of responsibility off employers to do some. But it spreads it around, and it means some people who currently can't get it would have access to it. You wouldn't be double-dipping, if that's what you're getting at.
I didn't put that—