You're obviously having to balance a variety of public policy objectives when you're looking at the allocation of infrastructure money. One of those objectives is the return to the taxpayer. In the case of communities where it is currently not economic under the economic formula that a regulator sets for utilities to extend natural gas infrastructure to those communities, that's where the federal government can see merit in stepping in. It may be meeting cost reduction public policy objectives—you have consumers in that region. It may be meeting environmental or industrial development objectives, or if there are particular mining sector activities you'd like to see go forward that would turn on the availability of affordable energy.
It's a question of which combination of public policy objectives you bring to the table when you're looking at the allocation of infrastructure moneys that you have set aside.