Okay. But I think it's clear that if taxes were higher in Canada they likely would not have come back to Canada.
In your report on the surplus you say, and I quote:
Policymakers should be wary of using surpluses to implement permanent tax relief or spending initiatives if they wish to avoid returning to deficits as economic growth subsides.
Then you go on later to say under the spending section:
There is policy room to permanently increase spending or reduce the tax burden by 1.4 per cent of GDP ($28.2 billion in 2014-15) while maintaining the stability of public debt over a 75-year horizon.
I don't quite understand. O the one hand, you are cautioning against putting in permanent tax relief measures and on the other hand, you are saying that there is room for permanently reducing the tax burden. Can you square that circle for me please?