We're talking about the amount of the incentive. If you reduce business taxes by a dollar and say we're going to create a million jobs by just doing a dollar, someone would say it's not large enough to affect a business person's decisions to hire.
If the suggestion is that the disincentive created by dropping below this $15,000 threshold is not high enough to fire somebody, how can it be suggested that the reverse is suddenly true, even though the incentive is actually much higher to drop below this $15,000 line? The incentive going that way to reduce your payroll and get below the $15,000 is much higher than the one if you end up putting yourself above the $15,000 line.