I guess I would argue that it gives provinces, who are on the front lines—you're on the front lines too, but the provinces are the ones who are actually going to pay the bills—the ability to say....
For instance, let's take a border town like Niagara. If they had a flood of refugees who crossed the border, wouldn't that give the provinces a little bit of a lead way to say, “Yes, we can't stop you from crossing the border, but that won't guarantee that you're given refugee status or at least be looked after as we have in the past”? Doesn't that seem like a reasonable approach to that situation?