I agree with you. One of the observations I would make about the legislation as it is crafted right now is that there's not a compelling mandate there for CHARS to require the exchange of information among departments and agencies. That certainly is available at the reporting stage, but we found that it's very important at the planning stage, and sometimes that can be a year or two years or three years in advance of some of these programs. The operational, logistic, and infrastructure requirements of getting aircraft, icebreakers, equipment, and people into the Arctic region requires that planning, so one suggestion I'd make is that the legislation could strengthen the whole-of-government planning and investment in Arctic research coordination. That is implicit, but it would benefit from being explicit in CHARS.
It's not that it won't happen, but our observation, from working with international partners, is that it must happen if we're going to be effective in those types of partnerships. There are a number of examples of where that type of coordination between countries has fallen apart, and the research that was intended was not feasible.