If this COPA thing is right, the draft report reflects a strong consensus by industry participants that the applicability of the requirement to consult should be to new aerodromes only.
From the standpoint of a person who has one of these aerodromes—maybe they have planes that are spraying, or whatever it happens to be—there's nothing really there to protect them. The minister can make a decision based on a complaint, and then it would be overridden by the subsection that there be no statutory instruments. They could close that down. It's like the guy who moves out from the city and then complains about the farm because he moved next to it.
I'm wondering whether we are setting ourselves up for the same thing.