Yes. I think that's an opening there. I'm hearing Mr. Saxton essentially suggesting that it's going to be at some further stage when the government is looking to do regulations to better define due care and better take in industries' concerns around this.
The question begs, why not put it into legislation? If at the worst it's redundant and it provides clarity and certainty around this question of the due care requirement, we're then at a bit of a loss why the government wouldn't simply support it. If the worst argument that can be made is that it's redundant, and the best argument in favour of voting against it is that we're going to do in regulations later on anyways, why not put it into law? This is, of course, always much more certain, especially for an industry that's working on innovation and development of patents, so we rest with the arguments that have been made and support those made by Ms. May.