Having heard the comments from some of my Conservative colleagues earlier and from Mr. Hsu, this seeks to clarify exactly what everybody has talked about, which is that independent voice. It's incredibly straightforward. It seems to achieve that objective in a most transparent way.
When we're talking about what that voice is talking about—the epidemics or outbreaks or things of public concern—having that clear independent voice absent of any potential political interference would seem like a very important thing.
I congratulate my colleague on the clarity of his amendment.