Thank you.
That question has come up in previous discussions, and I'm happy to respond. I believe some of the proposed amendments speak to that as well.
One of the distinctions between the Canadian Polar Commission's references to reports to Parliament and this particular legislated proposal is that the CPC's references to accountability and reports to Parliament date back to 1991 when that legislation was passed. In this legislation, we are proposing to use modern drafting to be a bit more reference-light, if you will. But that doesn't take away from the substantive nature of reports to Parliament.
Therefore, this institution will have the same requirements to report to Parliament vis-à-vis the report on plans and priorities and the related reporting documents that Parliament will have a chance to look at.