Thank you.
The member is correct, and I would again describe it as a drafting technique. The proposed reference returns the leading aspect of the purpose section to being the dissemination of knowledge, which is exactly what the Canadian Polar Commission was all about. Bringing it into that frame and then listing the elements below it actually locks in the original mandate of the Canadian Polar Commission and does not extend it to the undertaking of research.
We have drafted it in such a way as to provide the four elements of the purpose in the way it is laid out. It then works with proposed section 6 to give more teeth, if you will, to the research and knowledge-development component. That was the drafting intent behind this particular approach. That's the way it's represented.