Okay.
I have one question, because I did discuss this during our committee hearings, that I want to ask Mr. Segard. There was a question raised during the hearings—not necessarily by a member but by people before the committee—intimating that if this passes the chief public health officer would provide advice to the president and then the president would provide the advice to the minister. The chief public health officer would be subordinate to the president in that role. Can you clarify this to me? The legislation is quite explicit:
The Chief Public Health Officer shall provide the Minister and the President with public health advice that is developed on a scientific basis.
Can you address that for me?