Although I have reread the motion, I cannot make sense of it. I would like Mr. Saxton to explain to me what it is he wants to study. He is proposing a study of the cost, economic impact, frequency and best practices to address the issue of terrorist financing. So we will be studying the cost of terrorist financing in Canada. Will we be studying the cost of terrorist financing or the cost of the impact terrorism has in Canada? I'm having a hard time grasping the nature of the motion.
Mr. Saxton, can you tell me a bit more about the motion?