Someone in our last panel said this is the biggest reaction to a non-event, which was the Saudis talking about an extra 300,000 or 400,000 barrels a day. The markets responded, and we've seen this. The political nature of this is important, because it affects the economics and the economic output.
If economics was left to its own devices, if the market was left to do what it would do, the commonly used expression “the solution to low oil prices is oil” would be true. Does adding in the geopolitics to this—the Saudis, the Russians, etc.—not create the potential at least for a longer-term experience of these $50-a-barrel prices? Is that a reasonable assumption to make, mixing those two things together?