Yes, thank you. In my opinion—and I'm not a lawyer, but I have studied the terrorism financing issue here in Canada—I think the two cases you just raised did challenge the Canadian Constitution and quite wisely, I think. The Canadian courts have determined they were unconstitutional, but after all, the information about terrorism financing doesn't necessarily derive from the lawyers serving different organizations. There are other means of acquiring that intelligence.
In my own opinion—and we could discuss this—I think we want an expanded or an enhanced investigative capacity on the part of FINTRAC and other related Canadian intelligence organizations to focus precisely in Canada and abroad on terrorism financing. It wouldn't violate the relationship between clients and lawyers. It would seek out intelligence from the sources of terrorism financing.