I want to go back to this notion of good faith bargaining with my last question for Mr. Trottier.
Can you understand the union's position that this is a legislative gun held to their head as they go through trying to negotiate with the government? The fact that it's been at the table for more than a year doesn't necessarily suggest that it's been the union that's been holding up the negotiations on this particular issue. If a government in future were to say that it's going to hold up a particular issue because it knows it has an ability to push something through law that it can't negotiate, does that not create an atmosphere in which good faith negotiation is not possible?