Yes. I think it's fair that you reach a point where the high-income earner is overtaxed to the point where there is a disincentive to work. That's probably not something that you want to do, in particular when some of those high-income earners are people like doctors, for example, who are important to us as a society, or entrepreneurs, who may otherwise be taxed at a high rate and again could otherwise build jobs and companies and contribute in another economic way to our society if they weren't so heavily taxed.
I see both sides of the coin, but I have a hard time getting my head around the reallocation or potential reallocation of moneys for children from people who need it to people who don't.
If it's such that the low-income earners, based on the Department of Finance's research, are not left high and dry and are in more or less the same situation, I would still prefer to see more moneys going to those people, if anything, at the expense of people like me.