Yes, I can. There have been instances in the United States where, when determining whether communications between advisers and clients should be privileged, they look to the jurisdiction where the communications occurred. If privilege is not extended in that jurisdiction, they will not provide a privilege in their jurisdiction. So if there's no privilege in Canada, we're not going to give it to you in the United States. That's one way to look at it.
Another way to understand the present situation in Canada is to look at situations where privilege was actually given to communications, for example in the United Kingdom, where privilege exists.
In court proceedings in Canada, they will actually strip away that privilege and force the disclosure of the communications that occurred in that foreign jurisdiction. So at least currently there's no judicial comity. It's basically, sorry, if you're going to deal with the Canadian courts, you're going to deal with the Canadian system, and, unfortunately, privilege does not extend to those types of communications at this point in time. This legislation has addressed that gap.