Very quickly, on the completion ratios and rates, one of the concerns we have had is the way incompletions are counted. Unless they have rectified this, if I start my apprenticeship in Ontario and move to Alberta, I'm incomplete in Ontario even though I may succeed in Alberta.
Also, if my apprenticeship training leads to another position or occupation where I don't have to get the journeyperson status, for example, when building a refinery one of Mr. Ferguson's members employs me to work in that refinery and I don't need my ticket, if you will, I'm again considered incomplete even though my apprenticeship training has led to my being gainfully employed in an occupation I've been trained for.
I think the first question I would have is, are completion rates the correct benchmark for success for apprenticeship training? That's a question I have which I don't have an answer for, but I'd love to see an examination. That's number one.
Number two, I think the incentive grants have been helpful to apprentices; there's no question about it. My concern, however, is the incentive for employers to engage first-year and second-year apprentices through the apprenticeship job creation tax credit, as the incentive was gutted by the CRA ruling. I don't blame the CRA. They just said that's the way the thing was designed, hence this is the way we have to act.
My last point on that, is it's limited to Red Seal trades only. While Red Seal trades are important, there are a lot of trades that aren't Red Seal that are provincially recognized.