When we look historically at the performance of multilateral development banks and international financial institutions, we haven't seen that kind of concern brought forward. We haven't seen a run on shares. When you look historically at our engagement with similar institutions since the 1940s, we haven't seen that pattern of behaviour. Obviously we would never be in a position to guarantee the performance of every bank, but I think there's a quite solid historical record.
I think as well that given the broad membership of the bank, including many of our like-minded partners, if there were such a large concern with the governance of the bank that everybody was looking to potentially pull out, that would also voice common concerns that presumably would be raised at the bank, where the governance would be able to be dealt with, if there is a majority of shareholders with those concerns. Presumably we would be able to work with our like-minded and other shareholders to be able to address those concerns in a meaningful way at the bank.