That's what I picked up from your testimony in response to some of the questions that were asked. It's the letter that follows, the clarification letter, that has changed. If we were to try to get to a solution to this, rather than using the new language that seems to have caused some consternation, would you be in favour of using the old language that refers to the existing legislation? Would that be the right thing?
On November 7th, 2017. See this statement in context.