This is really one of our biggest concerns.
What we're saying is that we don't understand why CRA agents are overturning the certifications of expert doctors and nurse practitioners who are attesting that a patient is requiring the 14 hours. As I mentioned at the outset of my remarks, I don't pretend to say that every single type 1 case always takes 14 hours a week, but many do. Who could possibly be in a better position to comment on that than the doctor or nurse who's managing that person's care? When those doctors and nurses are putting their licences to practise on the line by saying that their patients meet the criteria, frankly I find it stunning that analysts in tax centres would feel they know better and would overturn those attestations.