I don't see many. I'll reiterate that I think that the interest of the minority shareholders was to protect their nationals based on the theory—which may not be a valid theory at all—that preference would be given to the nationals who are bidding for these contracts, assuming they are going to continue to be P3s. I don't think there's any doubt about that. The private sector will be involved.
If that was the main driver, I don't see any wonderful return to a development bank's minority shareholders. I could be sympathetic to the argument that the $500 million should have gone into the Canada infrastructure bank to encourage more private participation in that and build more infrastructure in Canada. However, I'm not an economist. I'm just a lawyer.