Let me go back to the Washington consensus, which preceded the Beijing consensus. The Washington consensus ultimately didn't work because it basically said that if developed countries adopted macroeconomic stability—low inflation and low government deficits and so on—growth would then take care of itself. The Beijing consensus, similarly, is focused on what the state does.
There is a long list of interventions, which you gave, but both of them actually had the same problem. They focus on what the government does instead of what the government doesn't, which to a considerable extent could be described as simply getting out of the way of market forces. Neither the Washington nor the Beijing consensus has its primary emphasis on what it is that firms need to innovate and grow.