I would like to reiterate what I said.
The minister made unequivocal statements before all of the parliamentarians of this country. The committee needs to understand how she came to her conclusions. She did not say she would look into the matter and get to the bottom of things. She said there was no amnesty, nor any amnesty proposal. And yet the Radio-Canada investigation and the subsequent investigations showed that there was an amnesty proposal.
I need to understand, as a parliamentarian, what information she had and why she came to such a conclusion. We need to understand this.
The government members tell us that we don't have enough time to talk about the guaranteed minimum income, but that we will find time to discuss this and that eventually—we hope—we will have another meeting before the end of June on this issue, after having met with the person whose reports are given to the minister. The minister has to answer to parliamentarians.
It is the committee's responsibility to ask her to appear, together with Ms. Henderson and the other persons responsible who have already been mentioned, in order that we may have an overall picture of the situation and not only the viewpoint of an official from the Canada Revenue Agency.