If you look at the international experience, the U.K. is held up as the gold standard right now. It has a public registry of what it calls “people with significant control”. It's a statutory requirement not only for corporations, but also shareholders, to report their ownership above a certain threshold.
The European Commission has a directive that also requires that its countries have and create registries as well, and are, themselves, moving toward public registries.
As for ours, as Annette pointed out, we're making those steps forward. The Americans are also bringing in similar sorts of moves now to try to create requirements on...advise...and to collect beneficial ownership information.
Internationally, within the FATF, there are 37 countries involved. However, we also have this network of FATF-style regional bodies, which covers some 190 countries. As you're all well aware, some of those international financial centres are where some of the challenges come from. I think that's where the value of the FATF and ourselves as active participants within FATF is: to work with these regional bodies and to apply the type of peer pressure that will enable us to build a good global network and to deal with this. It is a global issue. We know that. We've seen complicated structures within corporations. It requires a good international effort across all of those groups.