Okay, thank you.
In terms of the beneficial ownership question—and you stated that the U.K. and the European Commission tend to be the gold standard—it seems that, based on the conversation here, part of the issue is really around lawyers. That seems to be a big gap, an opportunity, and I understand there was a court case that allowed for some of the...but the U.K. doesn't have that different a legal system. Obviously, the laws are different, but I'm curious if the department—or maybe this is a better question for Justice—is looking at the legal framework in the U.K. that meets that test while being in line with their own privacy laws and could help us close this gap? Again, their legal system is not completely dissimilar from ours. Why is it something that their rule of law can accommodate but ours seems to be missing? Is there language or a process that needs to be better addressed that we can look at?