Evidence of meeting #137 for Finance in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was bitcoin.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Shahin Mirkhan  Broker of Record, Max Realty Solutions Ltd., As an Individual
Jonathan Hamel  President, Académie Bitcoin

6:20 p.m.

President, Académie Bitcoin

Jonathan Hamel

It is in fact $21 million.

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

You also said that a certain number of bitcoins were created every year. Who set that number? Could it potentially be changed?

6:20 p.m.

President, Académie Bitcoin

Jonathan Hamel

You are right. That number was in bitcoin's initial submission, which laid out the particularities and attributes of bitcoin under the pseudonym of Satoshi Nakamoto. We don't know who he is. It may also be a group.

This decision could be changed, but the consensus required to change that attribute is relatively improbable, since the vast majority of players in the bitcoin world behave in an economically rational manner. It would be irrational to devalue their assets. For example, by wanting to double the total quantity of bitcoins, bitcoin owners would devalue their currency for no reason. In fact, the real strength—

6:20 p.m.

NDP

Pierre-Luc Dusseault NDP Sherbrooke, QC

Would there be a vote? How would it work?

6:20 p.m.

President, Académie Bitcoin

Jonathan Hamel

At bitcoin, users vote. It's a false belief to think that minors control bitcoin. The actual people who control bitcoin are users, who vote, in a way, by choosing the version they use. To change that attribute, what is called a fork would have to be done, which means going to another version that would be something different from bitcoin. So it would no longer be bitcoin, and the majority of users would have to be convinced to use that version, so it is very unlikely.

6:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Wayne Easter

We'll have to leave it at that. This has been a very interesting discussion on both fronts.

Thank you, Mr. Mirkhan.

Thank you, Mr. Hamel.

We have seven minutes and 30 seconds to get to a vote, so the meeting is adjourned.

Thank you very much.