I'll say one thing and then defer to Ms. Johnson, because I think she may have more insight to offer than I do on this.
Your question really demonstrates to me the important point to keep in mind, that in many cases and many transactions, there are a number of players, some of whom have reporting obligations and some of whom may not. The courts don't and, of course, lawyers don't, but banks do. It's always important, I think—and we've talked about this a lot in our work—to think about that web.
On a tangentially related point, we are concerned about the fact that it is possible for somebody to deposit money into somebody else's account. If you are a lawyer with a trust account, it is possible for someone to go to the bank and deposit cash into your trust account or in another form, and you can't stop it. We've talked to banks. There's some possibility of flagging the account—they're supposed to phone—but it's very porous. We are unable in many cases to get that information from the banks as to who made the deposit.
I mention that only because it's a tangled web with many players, each of whom may present a risk and may have a role to play in the monitoring activities.
I imagine Ms. Johnson has more.