I would add just one small supplementary point to what was already said, which is that there are numerous cases where the lawyer will actually act as the nominee shareholder or director. When law enforcement or banks or whoever are seeking information about the beneficial owners, the lawyer will say, that's privileged, solicitor-client information. That has definitely been an issue. Although, again, if the government passes beneficial ownership...changes corporate law, then that would remove any privilege from that information. At that point, it's not privileged; in fact it will be available in a public registry.
