That's an answer I'd like to come back to. However, I didn't get an answer to my second question, about the meeting to draft a report on what we'll have heard. It's good to have an appearance, but if we only have a meeting where we hear arguments and we don't come back later to analyze within the committee what we discussed, I think that's a problem. It's a matter that requires a lot more discussion, which is why our initial motion mentioned a subsequent meeting to, and I quote:
... that the committee plan an additional meeting to consider a draft report.
Discussing this within the Standing Committee on Finance is one thing; being able to draft a report to Parliament is another.