Yes, in two ways. The first one, I think, would be in terms of the solicitor-client privilege and the fact that if for some of the transactions we can show there's an intent of doing something wrong, then it would not fall under the solicitor-client privilege. That would help.
Also, it would help if the law were to be reviewed or amended in such a way that the letter of the law represents the spirit of the law. There is always a chief loophole officer somewhere, hanging around and making a very healthy and very wealthy living just by finding loopholes. That's the thing: I think that every time there is a review you need to try to identify what are the loopholes and stuff like that.