As I said, we are assuming that the lump sum is going to go back. In our view, in looking at different options of reducing corporate taxes or reducing income taxes, the least efficient is the one you mentioned, namely, its going back as a lump sum to households. From an economic perspective, that would be the least efficient way of doing it. That's why we showed this negative impact that's going from 0.1% to 0.5% by the end of the projection. If we use any other method that is more efficient from our point of view, through corporate taxes or income tax, the negative impact would be lower than that.
On April 23rd, 2018. See this statement in context.