There haven't been situations like that. Usually the replacement of the chair would be for a longer-term vacancy in the position. For example, if a chair's term had expired and a new chair had not yet been appointed, or if there had been an illness or some other long-term issue. It's not about the issue of this short-term coverage or any issues that have arisen there. Two vice-chair positions were phased out, resulting from budget cuts in 2011.
The intent here is to make it much clearer if there is that kind of a gap in the chair position, who the appropriate person would be acting in that position. Right now, it can be any of the other members and requires that—