The committee met before it had received the bill. I'm looking at how thick it is and the scope of the clauses in it. I know I was cautious in what I said to the subcommittee. I did not say that we should finish the study in a week. I suggested that we leave one week open for this study, but we did not set any specific date for completing our report and the clause-by-clause study.
That is why I agree on the possibility of continuing the study during the last week, not to delay anything, but so that in the month of June, in a reasonable time period, the bill can be referred to the House.