Ultimately, if we don't have a good picture of the health of those airports and therefore of the level of concern regarding the infrastructure and capital, we don't know if we should really be tripling down, because we're going to lose x amount of annual recurring operating revenue while at the same time vastly increasing the capital. While that's what the finance committee is here to look at and make recommendations on, we don't have all the information with which to evaluate that effectively.
Again, the rent allows the federal government to have income to redistribute to perhaps other airports that are not in the NAS category, because there's no question that airports are critical to the economy throughout. So it's a bit of a balancing act because it is in the public interest.
I wonder if you could give us any more thoughts on that.