I'm glad somebody knows how Minister Duclos feels.
The only thing I can go from is the legislation and the BIA. All I see here is “aspirational”. The word is actually used. It's like a news release. Can you tell me why the decision was made not to include specific data points that could be tracked and then used by parliamentarians to hold the government to account on these so-called targets under proposed paragraphs 2(a) and 2(b)?