I just want to reiterate exactly what has just been said. I agree. Except for the issue of retroactive payments in the maintenance phase—which we feel corresponds quite clearly to the problem that was raised before the Supreme Court and that was considered unconstitutional in Quebec legislation—implementing the legislation over time will reveal the shortcomings in the legislation.
It is nevertheless important to know that, if the legislation is not appropriately applied and does not help correct wage discrimination, it may be unconstitutional in several respects. In Quebec, in 2004, another case was heard by the Superior Court. On that occasion, a whole other part of Quebec's legislation was declared unconstitutional. However, this became clear only as it was applied. We'll see.