We're not saying that the bill itself is unconstitutional; we're saying that a specific section of the bill would need to be amended because the court has just recently ruled on a similar provision in the Quebec legislation. It's identical. I think it has problematic application if it's not changed.
Of course, we're very good at taking cues from the court when we are successful. We will be back in the courts, and it would be unfortunate for that to happen.